Christ Church’s Policy on Wine & Communion

            Over the last one hundred and fifty years of church history there has been great debate about the use of wine at the Lord’s Supper. Some argue that to drink wine, including at the Lord’s Supper, is sin. Others argue that there should be wine and grape juice present at the Lord’s Supper so that those who do and do not consider that drinking wine is Biblical can partake of the cup. Finally, there are those who think wine and only wine should be used. Christ Churchfalls into this last category. While we acknowledge these other positions, we believe that they do injustice to the plain teaching of Scripture. Because this is a controversial topic among Christians, we think it is important for Christ Church to state the reasons for our position. What follows is our official church position on using wine in communion. We have tried to be gracious and biblical. 
I am sure someone will ask, “Isn’t it inconsistent to use wine and not unleavened bread?”  I hope to address unleavened bread at some future date. 
The Bible Says that Wine is Good
            The Scriptural teaching concerning wine is uniform. Wine has always been considered one of God’s good gifts to man. Melchizedek gave wine to Abraham after he returned from the slaughter of the kings.  (Genesis 14:18)  God commanded that wine be offered to Him as part of the Levitical sacrificial system. (Exodus 29:40, Leviticus 23:13)  At King David’s coronation banquet in I Chronicles 12:38-40, the men drank wine. In Psalm 104:15, wine is said to be a gift from God to gladden man’s heart.  The great coming kingdom and the gospel are often envisioned by the prophets as having an abundance of wine.  (Is. 25:6, 55:1, Hosea 14:7, Joel 3:18) The loss of wine is considered a great tragedy and a sign of God’s curse upon Israel. (Isaiah 16:10, 24:7, Lamentations 2:12).
            The New Testament teaching is the same. Wine is a good thing when rightly used. In 1Timothy 3:3, the elder of a church is not forbidden wine, but is told to not be addicted to it (New American Standard Version) or a drunkard (English Standard Version).  Wine is a picture of the Gospel. (Luke 5:36-39)  Jesus drank wine. (Luke 7:34)  Paul instructs Timothy to drink wine for medicinal purposes. (I Timothy 5:23)
            There is some debate about whether or not Jesus used wine at the Last Supper.  Here are the reasons why we know that He did use wine during the Last Supper. First, the Passover was celebrated in the spring. Grapes were harvested in the fall. Without refrigeration there is no way the wine would not ferment. Second, the term “the fruit of the vine,” which Jesus uses throughout the Last Supper accounts, was a term the Jews used during their Passover celebrations. They drank wine during Passover. There is no doubt that “fruit of the vine” equals wine, not grape juice.  For a first century Jew that is all it could have referred to. Third, it is clear from Paul’s account in I Corinthians that people were getting drunk at the Lord’s Supper. This means they were drinking wine. When Jesus instituted the Lord’s Supper he used wine. 
            There are multiple reasons not to substitute grape juice for wine in the Lord’s Supper. Wine is a gift from God symbolizing the gospel and the glorious Kingdom of God. Christ used wine at the Last Supper. The apostolic church used wine in their Communion meals. We should use wine during our Communion services. This is what Christ commanded.

What About the Drunkard?
            One of the more common objections to the use of wine in the Lord’s Supper is the drunkard. What about the man tempted to abuse alcohol?  Should we give him grape juice in order to prevent him from stumbling? Clearly the Scripture condemns drunkenness.  Both the Old Testament (Proverbs 20:1) and New Testament (Ephesians 5:18) forbid drunkenness.  Despite these strong warnings, we have several Old Testament and New Testament examples of wine being drunk. Let’s look at the two New Testament examples.
            In John 2:1-10 we have the familiar story of our Lord turning water into wine.  Jesus had no problem giving dozens, possibly hundreds, of people wine. The amount of wine was somewhere between 120-180 gallons.  At the end of a wedding feast, when people are more likely to be getting drunk, Jesus made more wine when requested to do so.
            A second passage, and one more to the point about the Lord’s Supper, is I Corinthians 11:18-34.  Here Paul is condemning the church at Corinthfor their misuse of the Lord’s Supper. They are not waiting for one another, but rather are eating and drinking as soon as they arrive.  Thus some members of Christ’s body are being left out.  What is pertinent for our discussion is that there was enough wine for people to get drunk on. (I Cor. 11:21)  Despite this, Paul never tells the church not to use wine.  Here the problem is not that people might get drunk. They are actually getting drunk. Yet, Paul does not take this opportunity to tell them to avoid wine altogether, since it might cause the drunkard to stumble.
            We are sympathetic to the temptations that some of us have. We know that there may be those at Christ Church who believe that they cannot drink the wine because it might cause them to stumble with regard to alcohol. We pray that this would be a temporary situation. We pray that in due time those who struggle with drunkenness would overcome that temptation by faith and the strength of the Spirit and would be able to partake of the wine as a gift from Christ for our spiritual growth. 
What About the Weaker Brother?
            After the drunkenness argument, the other common objection to serving wine at the Lord’s Supper is that it can offend the weaker brother. Paul specifically warns Christians not to cause the weaker brother to stumble. (Romans 14, I Cor. 8)  The point Paul is making in these chapters is vitally important to the life of a church. There will always be weaker and stronger Christians. How they treat one another is a sign to the watching world of their love for Christ. However, there are good reasons for concluding that the admonitions Paul gives in these passages do not prevent churches from using wine in Communion.
            First, these passages have nothing to do with the Lord’s Supper. That does not mean they have no bearing, but one must be careful in drawing sweeping conclusions from passages that do not deal with the subject at hand.
            Second, if drinking wine in Communion causes a weaker brother to stumble then why would Paul not forbid it in I Corinthians 11, where people were getting drunk?  In this passage, it is not just the possibility of stumbling that is present, but actual sin.  Here we have a passage speaking explicitly of the Lord’s Supper where people are getting drunk and Paul never says to not use wine.
            Third, if drinking wine is a stumbling block, why are pastors not forbidden from drinking it? And why is Timothy commanded to drink it? If the point in Romans 14 and I Corinthians 8 is that drinking wine is a stumbling block then why should the leaders of the Church be allowed to do it?
            Fourth, the point in these passages is not liturgical practice, but personal deference to a weaker brother.  A church should not adjust liturgical practice because of a weaker brother. They should teach the weaker brother how to mature so he can fully participate in the service. They should not judge him. That means the stronger brother should not show contempt for the weaker brother. (Romans 14:10) However, this does not mean that liturgical practice should be adjusted because someone has a scruple.
            Finally, the Lord’s Supper is not a scruple/doubtful thing/opinion. (Romans 14:1)  Christ commanded us to keep the Supper. He used wine. We are not justified in changing what He commanded. The Communion table is not the same as drinking wine around the dinner table.  There are many issues in the Christian life, which are matters of opinion. On those issues we should be careful not to cause our brother to stumble. The Lord’s Supper is not one of these issues.
Summary of the Policy of Christ Church
-We use wine during the Lord’s Supper because this is what Christ and the Apostolic church used.
-Someone who does not wish to take the wine is welcome to eat the bread only. They still receive Christ.
-Individuals who do not drink the wine will be gently encouraged to grow to the place where they understand the Biblical teaching concerning wine and the blessing it is to God’s people. However, they will never be judged as lesser Christians because of their refusal to drink wine. They are full members of the body of Christ. 

Heidelberg Catechism on the Lord’s Supper

Of The Holy Supper Of Our Lord Jesus Christ
28. Lord’s Day
Q: 75. How are you admonished and assured in the Lord’s Supper, that you are a partaker of that one sacrifice of Christ, accomplished on the cross, and of all his benefits?
A: Thus: That Christ has commanded me and all believers, to eat of this broken bread, and to drink of this cup, in remembrance of him, adding these promises:  first, that his body was offered and broken on the cross for me, and his blood shed for me, as certainly as I see with my eyes, the bread of the Lord broken for me, and the cup communicated to me; and further, that he feeds and nourishes my soul to everlasting life, with his crucified body and shed blood, as assuredly as I receive from the hands of the minister, and taste with my mouth the bread and cup of the Lord, as certain signs of the body and blood of Christ.
Q: 76. What is it then to eat the crucified body, and drink the shed blood of Christ?
A: It is not only to embrace with believing heart all the sufferings and death of Christ and thereby to obtain the pardon of sin, and life eternal;  but also, besides that, to become more and more united to his sacred body,  by the Holy Spirit, who dwells both in Christ and in us; so that we, though Christ is in heaven  and we on earth, are notwithstanding “flesh of his flesh and bone of his bone”  and that we live, and are governed forever by one spirit,  as members of the same body are by one soul.
Q: 77. Where has Christ promised that he will as certainly feed and nourish believers with his body and bleed, as they eat of this broken bread, and drink of this cup?
A: In the institution of the supper, which is thus expressed:  “The Lord Jesus, the same night in which he was betrayed, took bread, and when he had given thanks, he brake it, and: said: eat, this is my body, which is broken for you; this do in remembrance of me. After the same manner also he took the cup, when he had supped, saying: this cup is the new testament in my blood; this do ye, as often as ye drink it, in remembrance of me. For, as often as ye eat this bread, and drink this cup, ye do show the Lord’s death till he come.”. This promise is repeated by the holy apostle Paul, where he says “The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not the communion of the blood of Christ? The bread which we break, is it not the communion of the body of Christ? For we being many are one bread, and one body: for we are all partakers of that one bread.”


 

29. Lord’s Day
Q: 78. Do then the bread and wine become the very body and blood of Christ?
A: Not at all: but as the water in baptism is not changed into the blood of Christ, neither is the washing away of sin itself, being only the sign and confirmation thereof appointed of God; so the bread in the Lord’s supper is not changed into the very body of Christ; though agreeably to the nature and properties of sacraments, it is called the body of Christ Jesus.
Q: 79. Why then does Christ call the bread “his body”, and the cup “his blood”, or “the new covenant in his blood”; and Paul the “communion of body and blood of Christ”?
A: Christ speaks thus, not without great reason, namely, not only thereby to teach us, that as bread and wine support this temporal life, so his crucified body and shed blood are the true meat and drink, whereby our souls are fed to eternal life;  but more especially by these visible signs and pledges to assure us, that we are as really partakers of his true body and blood by the operation of the Holy Spirit as we receive by the mouths of our bodies these holy signs in remembrance of him;  and that all his sufferings and obedience are as certainly ours, as if we had in our own persons suffered and made satisfaction for our sins to God.
30. Lord’s Day
Q: 80. What difference is there between the Lord’s supper and the popish mass?
A: The Lord’s supper testifies to us, that we have a full pardon of all sin by the only sacrifice of Jesus Christ, which he himself has once accomplished on the cross; and, that we by the Holy Spirit are grafted into Christ,  who, according to his human nature is now not on earth, but in heaven, at the right hand of God his Father,  and will there be worshipped by us.  But the mass teaches, that the living and dead have not the pardon of sins through the sufferings of Christ, unless Christ is also daily offered for them by the priests; and further, that Christ is bodily under the form of bread and wine, and therefore is to be worshipped in them; so that the mass, at bottom, is nothing else than a denial of the one sacrifice and sufferings of Jesus Christ, and an accursed idolatry.
Q: 81. For whom is the Lord’s supper instituted?
A: For those who are truly sorrowful for their sins, and yet trust that these are forgiven them for the sake of Christ; and that their remaining infirmities are covered by his passion and death; and who also earnestly desire to have their faith more and more strengthened, and their lives more holy; but hypocrites, and such as turn not to God with sincere hearts, eat and drink judgment to themselves.
Q: 82. Are they also to be admitted to this supper, who, by confession and life, declare themselves unbelieving and ungodly?
A: No; for by this, the covenant of God would be profaned, and his wrath kindled against the whole congregation;  therefore it is the duty of the Christian church, according to the appointment of Christ and his apostles, to exclude such persons, by the keys of the kingdom of heaven, till they show amendment of life.

Take Up and Read: Lord’s Supper Edition

For most evangelical Protestants the sacraments, baptism and the Lord’s Supper, are window dressing, a decoration that we place on our private, individual Christianity. Even those who take baptism seriously usually see it as a sign of individual faith, with little or no corporate dimension at all. This is not what the Scriptures teach, at least not what they primarily teach. So here are some essays on the Lord’s Supper which give a more robust and biblical understanding of Communion. Next week, I will put up another list on baptism. So take up and read!

If you don’t know who Rich Lusk is you should. He is a great oral communicator and good writer. Here is a short essay he wrote on what paedocommunion teaches us about God. Paedocommunion is the belief that all who are baptized, including infants, should be allowed to eat the Lord’s Supper.

Michael Horton explains why we should celebrate the Lord’s Supper every week. It is a longer article, but worth your time.

Douglas Wilson gives an exhortation every week at the communion table. Here are a few I enjoyed. They are all very short.
Fussers and Ladder Kickers
Answering the Invitation
Christ is not Food to the Faithless

Here is a short summary of the Lord’s Supper from J.I. Packer.

Finally, here is a nice summary of John Calvin’s view of the Lord’s Supper from Robert Godfrey