Book Review: The Church in the Theology of the Reformers

Church in the Theology of the ReformersChurch in the Theology of the Reformers by Paul D.L. Avis
My rating: 5 of 5 stars

To read this book is to enter into two worlds that I am unfamiliar with. First, the world of the reformation. Avis carefully places the reader back into 16th & 17th and tries to get us to understand how they thought. Second, the world of a scholar. Avis’ scholarship is excellent. He brings a thorough knowledge of the subjects. His writing is clear and logical as he moves through the various topics, which shows his grasp of the topics. With any good scholar you always feel like he knows way more than he is saying. This was true with Avis. All of this is to say that the book is a must read for pastors or theologians who want to understand the Reformers view of the church.

Avis relies heavily on Luther, Calvin, and Hooker to develop his points. He shows what was central throughout the theology of the reformers and what was secondary. Christ and his Word, the Gospel are at the center and are the only thing necessary for a church to exist. He explains how the borders of the church were eventually formed through an emphasis on church discipline and how this became more extreme as time moved on. He rightly critiques the separatist movements, which unfortunately look like most of modern Christianity including the reformed kind.

He lays out how the reformers could hold to the priesthood of all believers and yet still have a high view of the ministry. His sections on polity were very helpful in understanding the historical backdrop to the development of the episcopate in England,as well as showing that polity was a secondary, though still very important issue. He also showed how the the reformers’ view of “two kingdoms” informed their approach to the magistrate.

A rich and rewarding study that changed my views on the reformation and on current ecclesiastical issues.

View all my reviews

Children in the Covenant

“Baptism has no significance for Calvin if it does not mean admission to the visible church on th ground of the covenant promise, which includes presumptive regeneration of the children in the covenant. Calvin looks upon the child in the covenant as God’s child, forgiven of sin and regenerated, with the new life as a latent seed, already at work in its heart. The child then opens its eyes redeemed on a world in which by careful nuture it is expected to grow and develop in the Christian ideal of life and character. The important point is that this child is presumptively a Christian. That Calvin so meant we see clearly from this passage:

‘The offspring of believers are born holy, because their children, while yet in the womb, before they breathe the vital air, have been adopted into the covenant of eternal life. Nor are they brought into the church by baptism on any other ground than because they belonged to the body of the Church before they were born. How who admits aliens to baptism profanes it…For how can it be lawful to confer the badge of Christ on aliens from Christ. Baptism must, therefore, be preceded by the gift of adoption, which is not the cause of half salvation merely, buy gives salvation entire; and this salvation is afterwards ratified by Baptism.'”

(Lewis Bevens Schenck, The Presbyterian Doctrine of Children in the Covenant, p. 13)

Children in the Covenant

If anyone wants to understand on a historical level where we have come since the Reformation, in particular with regard to baptism, then I would greatly encourage the reading of Lewis Bevens Schenck’s book The Presbyterian Doctrine of Children in the Covenant. Schenck does a historical study beginning at the Reformation and ending in the early 1900s showing the devolution of the biblical doctrine of children in covenant. Reading it one can easily see that many presbyterians, and of course all baptists, have abandoned the reformers’ view of children in the covenant. Much of the current Federal Vision controversy is explained by this book. Over the next couple of weeks I will be posting some of the quotes I liked. Here is the first.

“To John Calvin then ‘baptism’ signifies the forgivness of sins. This means in the legal language of theology that those baptized presumably stand in the sight of God as justified, that is, with the guilt and punishment of sin removed by the mercy of God. He accepts them no longer as sinners, but as heirs, ‘heirs of God and joint heirs with Christ.’ And this adoptive act of God finds expression in the second meaning of baptism, ‘regeneration.’ (p. 8 )