We Deny. We Do Not Affirm.

same-sex-marriageReading this previous post will expand on and clarify some of what I say below. 

Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals, nor sodomites, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. And such were some of you. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God. (1Co 6:9-11)

More and more professing Christians affirm homosexual relationships. Jen Hatmaker was the most recent high profile Christian to say that she thought same-sex relationships can be “holy.”  Following this train there have been some, while not affirming same-sex relationships themselves, say that sodomy and lesbianism are not issues worth dividing over. Sodomy may be wrong, but it does not put someone outside the kingdom of Christ. In other words you can affirm same-sex relationships and still be a Christian. Is this true? Is sodomy an issue where Christians can agree to disagree like baptism? The answer is no. Someone who is an active homosexual or lesbian has no inheritance in the kingdom of God.  Continue reading

William Gouge on a Wife’s Submission

William Gouge (1575-1653) was a pastor in London from 1608-1653.  He was known as a great minister of the gospel, preaching three times a week, and an accomplished author. He also was a prominent member of the Westminster Assembly and help to write the Westminster Confession of Faith. Reformation Heritage Books took his book “Domestic Duties” and broke it down into three volumes. The quote below is from the first book, Building a Godly Home.   All italics are original.

The duty required is that a wife must yield a chaste, faithful, matrimonial subjection to her husband. 

A wife must submit herself to her husband, because he is her head. And she must do it “as unto the Lord” because her husband is to her as Christ is to the church.

The metaphor of a head declares both the dignity of a husband and the duty of a husband. As a head is set above the body, so is the husband to his wife.  As a head, by the understanding which is in it, governs, protects, preserves, and provides for the body, so does the husband his wife. At least, he ought to do so, for this is his office and duty. This is noted here to show the benefit which a wife receives by her husband, so that two motives are included under this metaphor.

The first is taken from the husband’s prerogative, from which note that subjection must be yielded to those who are over us. For this is a main end of the difference between party and party. To what end is the head set above the body, if the body be not subject to it?

The second is taken from the benefit which a wife reaps by her husband’s superiority, and it shows that they who will not submit themselves to their superiors injure themselves, like a body would injure itself, if it would not be subject to the head.

Later on he says this:

To direct and provoke wives to their duty, the apostle adds this clause, “as unto the Lord,” which is both a rule and a reason of wives’ subjection. It directs wives by noting the limitation of their obedience and the manner of it. The limitation is that wives ought to so obey their husbands as they obey the Lord, but no further: they may not be subject in anything to their husbands that cannot stand with their subjection to the Lord. The manner is that wives ought to yield such a kind of subjection to their husbands, as may be approved by the Lord….It provokes wives to submit themselves to their husbands by noting that the place of the husband is to be the Lord’s representative, bearing His image, and in that respect having a fellowship and partnership with the Lord. Therefore, wives in right subjection to their husbands are subject to the Lord. On the contrary side, wives, in refusing to be subject to their husbands refuse to be subject to the Lord. 

Sermon: Pursuing Peace

Here is a sermon I did a couple of weeks ago on pursuing peace in our congregation. The key verse was Hebrews 12:14.

Porn is Barren

barren-land

A good reminder from Pastor Douglas Wilson in his book Father Hunger.  Too many men want sex without children. Obviously this applies to porn, but it also applies to purposely barren marriages.

One of the things that should be most obvious to a man about the women involved in pornography is that such images, however appealing a man may find them, are images that can present him with no children. They are barren. They flaunt their breasts, but they will never nurse the children of those who gawk with them. The men who pursue such women are men who want such barrenness; they find it a selling point. Another way of saying this is that they don’t want to be fathers. They want the privileges of sexual release (after a fashion) but without the responsibilities that God’s wisdom necessarily attached to these pleasures.

The First Prayer: Heidelberg Catechism~ Lord’s Day 47

hallowed-be-thy-name

What is our first priority in prayer? When we pray what is the main goal? Jesus helps us answer this question by placing “Hallowed be your name” at the beginning of the Lord’s Prayer. Here, at the beginning of our fundamental prayer, Christ tells us that the main concern in our prayers should be that God’s name would be hallowed. That God would be worshiped and glorified and praised by our thoughts, words, and lives, as well as all peoples and nations around the world is our first prayer. Jesus will go on to tell us to pray for his kingdom to come and his will to be done. One author noted that this works backward. As God’s will is done, his kingdom is made manifest, and then his name is hallowed.

I pray for many things. I pray for my children, my church, my physical needs, my leaders, my parents, and my in-laws. But rarely do I focus those prayers towards hallowing God’s name. Usually these prayers are about what God provides us, not what we are supposed to give to God. How would our prayer lives change if our primary concern, our first prayer, was that God’s name, that is his character and works, would be glorified?

Which bring us to this week’s Heidelberg Catechism reading says:

Q: 122. Which is the first petition?

A: “Hallowed be thy name”; that is, grant us, first, rightly to know you, and to sanctify, glorify and praise you, in all thy works, in which thy power, wisdom, goodness, justice, mercy and truth, are clearly displayed; and further also, that we may so order and direct our whole lives, our thoughts, words and actions, that thy name may never be blasphemed, but rather honored and praised on our account. 

 If we were to break this down here is what that first petition is asking.

First, that we might rightly know God. We should study God. Theology is a Christian duty. Knowing God is our great aim. In order to treat God as holy we must know who he is, what his character is like, and what pleases him. We cannot hallow his name if we do not know him.

Second that we might sanctify, glorify, and praise God for all his wonderful works and how those works show forth His character.  What God does tells us who God is.  When we read about his wonderful deeds it should direct us back to his wonderful character, which in turn should lead to unceasing praise.

Third, that we should live in such a way that God’s name is honored on our account and not blasphemed. We can curse God with our lives as well as our tongues. Look at that little phrase. “Order and direct our whole lives…” Those words mean we are intentional and deliberate about what we do. We think about how God might be glorified by our actions. If we are considering sin we don’t just look at the consequences. We consider how our sin might blaspheme the Lord’s great name.  We ask, “How can I in the way I talk, think, and act honor the Lord.”

How would our prayer lives change if the glory of God’s name was our priority?  Would our requests change? Yes, I think they would.  Would our attitude change? Yes, that would change as well. Would our lives and the lives of those around us change? Certainly.  In short when we seek God’s glory above all else in prayer we become consumed by the one thing that ultimately matters; that our Father, who has created this world and redeemed us, should be praised and glorified by all men everywhere.

Kevin DeYoung summarizes it this way:

Our Father in heaven, the concern nearest to my heart and the one that shapes all other requests is that Your name would be regarded as holy, that Your fame would be heralded in the earth, that You would be honored among the nations, that Your glory would be magnified for all to see. O Lord, be pleased to cause men everywhere to take pleasure in You, that you might be praised now and forever.

Calvin says this about the first petition:

To summarize: we should wish God to have the honor He deserves; men should never speak or think of him without the highest reverence…His sternness no less than his leniency should lead us to  praise him, seeing that he has engraved marks of his glory upon a manifold diversity of works, and this rightly calls forth praises from every tongue… But the petition is directed also to this end: that all impiety which has besmirched this holy name may perish and be wiped out; that all detractions and mockeries  which dim this hallowing or diminish may be banished; and that in silencing all sacrileges, God may shine forth more and more in his majesty.

How do our prayers need to change so that hallowing God’s name is the priority when we kneel?